I don't want to accidentally come across like I'm carelessly
writing off other people's thoughts/feelings when I post about a personal pet
peeve, so here's a much longer form of personal expression. I'm not
asking anyone to agree with me or join forces with me (although as always,
anyone who wants to offer their thoughts/feelings/commentary on this is welcome
to do so). I'm just making a substantial effort to express parts of why I feel
the way I feel, act the way I act, and communicate the way I communicate. Also,
I know there's nothing perfect about me and nor do I want there to be (and
also, I know there's always room for personal improvement and personal growth).
But wherever I'm at, I do want to try my best be an open and honest
communicator, even if I make mistakes.
I will honestly admit that I don't relate to
"groupthink" or groups in general. I don't feel like I fit in to any
particular group and I don't desire to force myself to fit in anywhere in
particular. (Although I do realize to an extent that might be a kind of white
privilege - and that other people might not have as much of an opportunity or
choice to focus on themselves as individuals). It's not a matter of whether or
not I agree with the overall points of a group. It's more like the bigger the
agenda of the group, the less room there seems to be for divergence or free
thinking or individual thoughts, feelings, personal expression (which is my
preferred form of expression). At least that's my perception/impression of groupthink and
groups in general.
In addition to that, another main reason I don't like groups
on social media is they seem prone to leading towards group attacks. Even if
something significantly substantial is initially expressed, what is the
significantly substantial point of a group of people that seem to feel
similarly all responding/reacting to that point of view in a way that causes
the point of view to be overtaken by lashing out at anyone who feels
differently AND lashing out at people who feel similarly, but just don't
express their thoughts/feelings the same way. I don't know if I'm doing a good
job of describing this and I'm sure I've done it before too - the lashing out.
I've made mistakes, even to the point of accidentally ruining friendships,
because I expressed my point of view in a lashing out sort of way. I try not to
do it quickly or carelessly or frequently though. And I've never done it in an
attempt to catalyze a group attack - because then it sometimes starts to seem a
little bit like mob mentality (in my opinion). Like when someone else on the
thread expresses a sentence or two from a different approach/point of view and
quickly gets slammed and made fun of by whole handfuls of other adults. I don't
garner any enjoyment from making fun of someone based on a few sentences (but
some people in group attacks certainly seem to) and frankly, I don't see how
that furthers any particular cause.
Me saying that group attacks make me uncomfortable is not me
saying that they're right or wrong or silly or foolish; but they make me
uncomfortable because even if they started out by questioning a situation that
might have deserved to be seriously questioned, they often end up also angrily
attacking people who just feel a little bit differently or people who don't
respond to things the same way or who don't understand things the same way
etc...
In my opinion, based on my own online experience, this sort
of thing seems to happen most often in the realm of conversations that get
political and people start attacking other people when they don't even know the
details of the other person's point of view. Here's one example. During
election season, I had posted something on my facebook wall that ended up leading
towards a political debate sort of conversation. I don't remember the details
of the post or the conversation, but I do remember that a man I casually new in
real life (but new nothing about his political sensibilities because we had
never talked about that), came onto my wall and made some sort of angry,
aggressive, anti-hillary comment under the commentary of a few women who were
making pro-hillary comments. The women didn't bow down and succumb to his
negative aggression, they commented back, and he got angrier and more
aggressive, as well as racist and sexist and violently hostile. I was about to attempt
commenting on the situation, but then my phone rang and I ended up having a 30
minute or so phone conversation with my mom. I could hear my computer beeping
away in the background (indicating that more and more comments were being
posted), but I wasn't in front of my computer for half an hour or so. When I
got back on my computer, the man (who as I said, I had known casually in real
life) had unfriended me and blocked me, even though I hadn't made a single
comment on any of his comments, because I hadn't been online! So I guess he
unfriended and blocked me because two of my online friends (who I barely knew
at all) had offended him? And he just assumed I felt the same as them, even
though I hadn't said ANYTHING yet? (I mean, I'm glad he unfriended me, because
his comments were angry, aggressive and hostile, as well as racist and sexist -
but my point is I was quickly unfriended/blocked without even having expressed
my own point of view yet.)
Something some people may or may not know about me
(sometimes I think I talk about it too much; sometimes I think I don't talk
about it enough) is that about seven years ago, I had an unexpected stroke,
which resulted in some brain damage. I healed wonderfully for the most part (I
honestly think it was my strong passion for and drive towards poetry and
creative expression that seriously helped me heal), but my reading and writing
will always be significantly slower than it used to be - and certain things
that used to come naturally to me require a lot more concentration to achieve.
For example, I just had to dictionary.com whether "heal" or "heel"
was the right spelling there and that's something that would have come
naturally to me in the past. I have to do that a lot with basic words, to
remind myself of their spelling and of their meaning. While writing this, two
words that I looked up that my mind was off-kilter about their definitions were
"reaction" and "legitimate". (I also looked up
"groupthink", which I didn't even realize was an actual word and the
definition of that was "the practice of thinking or making decisions as a
group in a way that discourages creativity or individual responsibility" -
and after I read that definition, I felt confused about how anyone could view
that positively, because that definition sounds awful to me).
Anyway, here's where I'm going with this. In the past, my brain
used to understand certain types of academic language significantly better than
I am able to understand that type of language these days. For example, I used
to love reading really academic book reviews and so forth. In the present, one
arena in which I have a particularly hard time with words is the political
arena. In the past, I could express my political viewpoints in a specific and
detailed way; now I cannot. That doesn't mean I'm clueless or that I don't know
how I feel, but I have a hard time expressing it - and I have a hard time
understanding and categorizing political talk that involves real words combined
with jargon and rhetoric and propaganda and political correctness and shady
fine print and true/false/fake etc... I feel a little bit embarrassed to admit
this, but it's true. My brain does not entirely understand and can't reasonably
handle that stuff anymore.
At the risk of embarrassing myself even more (although I'm
not entirely sure why I feel ashamed about this, because it's not my fault that
my brain has this flaw - and frankly, I'd rather have trouble with corporate
style political language rather than with individualistic, creative, poetic
language), when I try to understand political language, I have to look up word
after word after word. This is one of the reasons I rarely participate in
political conversations on social media. Sometimes, after I find out a words
definition, it's still difficult for me to interpret its usage or POV in
certain sentences or bigger pictures. And sometimes in the social media group
attacks where political stuff comes into play to an extent, I honestly don't
understand a lot of what is being said. Last week or the week before, I had to
look up "fascism" to remind myself what it meant - then a few days
later, I forgot and had to ask my boyfriend to remind me what it meant - and
now I've already forgotten its definition again. Even when I look up its
definition again, that doesn't mean I can easily interpret its usage in every
sentence.
On one hand, it upsets me and causes me to feel sad that I'm
not as intelligent as I used to be (at least not on an academic or political
language sort of level). On another hand, I feel like it has made me less
judgmental based on the fine print, more open-minded, and more focused on how
other people act/react rather than how they talk. Unique
creative expression is still extremely important to me - but so is open-minded,
non-judgmental discourse, in which we don't all have to feel the same way, act
the same way, and talk the same way, etc....
On one hand, it bothers me that part of my brain might have
below-average intelligence and even though I still feel similarly to the way I
used to feel, I can't express certain things as well. On another hand, I'm glad
I can still express my own thoughts and feelings and that I can still express
myself creatively/poetically/artistically. And on another hand, my different
brain seems to have shown me that sometimes people who use a lot of academic
language might not understand (or might not care) that the main people they're
communicating with are other people who use a lot of academic language -
because a lot of other people don't even understand what they're talking about
because of their language. (Of course "academic language" there could
be replaced with all kinds of other words too, including "political"
and including "poetic". I write a lot of poetry that a lot of people
don't understand, because it's not there style of expression. I'm not criticizing
poetry language or political language or academic language per se; I'm just
pointing out that a lot of people don't understand certain kinds of language;
and why be condescending towards or enraged by someone who doesn't understand
things the same way you do? - unless they're unwilling to listen to or try to
consider other points of view).
Back to looking up words, if you don't already know what it
means, you might be interested in looking up the word "aphasia". I
have a certain mild form of aphasia as a result of my brain damage. That might
be a part of the reason why it seems like I post variations on the same things
fairly frequently. Which also sort of embarrasses me, because what if almost
everything I say is another variation of the same, a repetitive mess? What if I
think I'm being uniquely genuinely creatively expressive but I've said it all
before and before and before, ad infinitum (I was pretty sure ad infinitum made
sense there, but I had to look it up to be sure.)
?
Back to political language, since I have a difficult time
with that language these days, I sometimes wonder/worry if some people think
I'm keeping my mouth shut about certain things because I'm conservative. Well I
am most certainly not conservative, politically or otherwise. I am not someone
who doesn't care about marginalized groups, marginalized voices or about
marginalization (and I hope my posts don't give the impression that I'm
marginalizing important/significant things, because that is certainly not my
intent).
As I said, I'm not very good at expressing myself or
explaining myself politically but I can try. I consider myself Independent/Democratic/Liberal
but not extremist. I don't automatically "unfriend" people who have a
different political (or other) point of view than me, although there are times
I've been strongly tempted to. I think women's rights and minority rights are
hugely important and even though I try to be open to different points of view,
I have a hard time understanding and cannot at all relate to why anyone voted
for Trump. I am extremely anti the "pro-life" movement or any
movement that indicates that the government should have any control over
people's bodies. I certainly don't think racism or sexism or
LGBTQ-phobia should be ignored (or made worse) by the government. Police brutality
disgusts me. But aside from attempting to express my own viewpoints like that,
I'm not good at describing things in political language. Even though I'm not
extreme or an activist, I don't discredit activism. I think it's very important
and meaningful that some people are able to understand the details of larger
scale movements and work hard in support of others.
Occasionally people seem to interpret my wall posts as
attacking them or belittling their point of view, but I'm not trying to attack
or belittle any individual or any particular group. I just don't like group
attacks. I realize there are very valid reasons for some of them, but then they
often start going all over the place and making it harder to identify with or
understand the overall reasons, at least for me
No comments:
Post a Comment